“An Alternative to Obamacare” – What do You Think?

I don’t think I agree with all aspects of this plan, but it does seem a much better alternative than what Obama has proposed. I’d like to hear arguments for or against this plan.

Please post your thoughts on this “non-public” healthcare reform alternative proposed by Senators Coburn (OK) and Burr (NC) and Representatives Ryan (WI) and Nunes (CA).

…We have introduced a comprehensive health care reform bill, the Patients’ Choice Act that, we believe, will bring us far closer to the goal of universal coverage than the Obama plan. Our bill, in specific legislative language, does the following:

Puts affordable coverage and choice within reach of all Americans. We do this by first ending the discrimination in the tax code that rewards corporations and employers for offering insurance yet offers no benefit to the unemployed and is unfair to the self-employed…

Specifically, we would shift health care tax benefits to individuals and families in the form of a “Medi-Choice” tax rebate worth about $2,200 for individuals and $5,700 for families. Under our plan, if you like the health care you have, you can keep it – but you’ll have more money in your pocket because you will still receive a tax rebate…

Prevents cherry picking by guaranteeing access to coverage. Even though we’re confident that less government interference and more individual choice will control costs and improve quality and access, we recognize that markets can’t solve all problems. That’s why our bill prevents cherry picking – when insurance companies choose to cover only healthy patients – by equalizing risk across insurance companies and reversing the perverse incentives that leave those most vulnerable with the fewest options.

Our bill creates voluntary state-based solutions – state health exchanges – that will offer health insurance benefits using the same standard used for Members of Congress. Every American would have guaranteed access to coverage and care under this plan, regardless of patient age or health history. And to ensure that states get to design the solutions their patients need, states would have the freedom to form voluntary pooling arrangements with other state exchanges to diversify risk pools, ease administrative burdens and cover costs for insurance…

Strengthens the health care safety net. Currently, about 40 percent of doctors and hospitals do not accept Medicaid patients because payments are so low. This means that needy moms and kids may have health coverage, but poor access to health care. We remove the stigma from Medicaid recipients and give them the ability to purchase the health coverage and care they need from any provider. We preserve Medicaid for the blind, aged, and disabled and we eliminate widespread fraud in the programs. We do all this and still save states and the federal government about $1.3 trillion over the next 10 years.

Finally, our bill accomplishes these goals without spending any new federal money, or raising taxes. If this sounds too good to be true, we would note that the problem in health care is not that we don’t spend enough, but that Americans aren’t getting enough value for their dollars. On a per capita basis, America spends nearly twice what other industrialized nations spend on health care yet we are hardly twice as healthy.

The Obama plan promises change and progress, but it is based on old ideas. For the past 50 years, the Left has promised that a little more government intervention and spending will fix health care. If Washington can effectively run a health program like Obama’s public option, why are Medicare, Medicaid, and other federal health programs in such disrepair?

Today, federal and state government controls about 60 percent of our health care economy, which has helped create the chaotic system Americans loathe. Congress and the Obama administration are now on a path to finish the job and move us past the tipping point into a Canadian or UK-style government-run system.

The American people deserve better. Congress should be looking to 2040, not 1940 or 1965. We can achieve universal access to quality, affordable health care without bankrupting our children with trillions more in debt or imposing draconian tax hikes on all Americans. It can be done, and the Patients’ Choice Act shows us how.

Full article here.

Published in: on May 20, 2009 at 12:29 pm  Comments (1)  

The URI to TrackBack this entry is: https://patriotburr.wordpress.com/2009/05/20/an-alternative-to-obamacare-what-do-you-think/trackback/

RSS feed for comments on this post.

One CommentLeave a comment

  1. The people, asses though they may be, are demanding that something be done about health care. They are convinced that they are entitled to it whether they can pay for it or not. The best thing is to get gov’t out of health care, but barring that I like this plan because:

    1. It’s still me, my doc, and the insurance company making decisions.

    2. If a family has $5,700 to spend on insurance, providers will come up with innovative plans to cater to that specific amount. This plan will foster innovation.

    3. It will increase insurance portability as states begin to combine their risk pools.

    4. It will give people the option that Speaker Gingrich was talking about when he said in his most oft misquoted statement, “…the health care finance administration will whither on the vine [because people will prefer the free market alternative].”

    Not the best plan, but I think it is the best possible response to Obamacare.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: